Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
James Mcgee vs Jordi Samper-Montana Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mcgee vs Samper-Montana analysis and find out who is favored!
James Mcgee vs Jordi Samper-Montana Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mcgee 2 - 0 Samper-Montana
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mcgee has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Samper-Montana has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mcgee, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Samper-Montana has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mcgee has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Samper-Montana has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mcgee has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Samper-Montana winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mcgee has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 156/ 101), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 39/ 43). Samper-Montana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 69/ 51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mcgee winning 2 times and Samper-Montana being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Mcgee winning 4 and Samper-Montana winning 0. The last match between Mcgee and Samper-Montana was at the Noumea Challenger, 30-12-2013, First, Hard with James Mcgee getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:52:35.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mcgee and Samper-Montana have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mcgee winning 0 times and Samper-Montana 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mcgee winning 0, and Samper-Montana 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mcgee has played against opponents with an average rank of while Samper-Montana has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mcgee has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Samper-Montana has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mcgee has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Samper-Montana has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
146
High
37
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
179
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
57% (337-255)
Career Total W/L
56% (442-346)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$95,404
Career Prize Money
$84,925
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For James Mcgee vs Jordi Samper-Montana For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Mcgee VS Samper-Montana
Sportsbook
Offer
Mcgee VS Samper-Montana H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | James Mcgee | Jordi Samper-Montana |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:52:35 | 0:52:35 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (41/67) | 63% (38/60) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (23/41) | 55% (21/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (15/26) | 18% (4/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (35/60) | 43% (29/67) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Mcgee VS Samper-Montana H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
James Mcgee
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | James Mcgee | Jordi Samper-Montana |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
James Mcgee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Christian Harrison
Player
James Mcgee
58%
(
15 of
26)
1st Serve %
52%
(
13 of
25)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
32
Total Points Won
19
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
James Mcgee
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Mcgee
Player
Philip Bester
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
64)
4
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
5
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Nguyen
Player
James Mcgee
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Mcgee
Player
Christopher Rungkat
48%
(
44 of
91)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
86)
7
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
6
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 2-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
William Blumberg
Player
James Mcgee
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
7
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
9
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
James Mcgee
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
James Mcgee
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
5
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Mcgee
Player
Ruben Ramirez-Hidalgo
53%
(
63 of
120)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
112)
13
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
8
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
40%
(
23 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
50 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
119
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
James Mcgee
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Jordi Samper-Montana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gengo Kikuchi
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
9 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Len Schouten
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Palaphoom Kovapitukted
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ko Suzuki
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
90
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 0-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Shohei Chikami
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Toledo Bague
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mcgee Vs Samper-Montana Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Mcgee are available here and Samper-Montana photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
